Ancient Greeks believed that the flesh of a peacock did not decay after death, so it became a symbol of immortality.
While immortality is often sought after by monarchs as well as the rich and powerful, longevity risk is a real problem for the lay person in the Australian superannuation system. This is compounded by an uncertain economic environment exacerbating sequencing risk.
When the Labour government under Paul Keating introduced superannuation more than 30 years ago, the retirement age was 65 and people weren’t expected to live too much longer beyond that. Nowadays many baby boomers enjoy life well into their 90’s.
The changing demographics have in turn given rise to the dilemma of retirement income adequacy.
Without any default pension product, most superannuation funds offer a slight variation of the default balance fund (or MySuper) as the account-based pension. This gives rise to a plethora of challenges, most critically the ‘fit-for-purpose’ issue.
With retirement needs vastly different from objectives in the accumulation phase, should the investment strategy be fundamentally different too? The balancing act of managing sequencing risks versus longevity risks further complicates product development.
The Financial System Inquiry recommendation that all superfunds offer comprehensive income product in retirement (CIPR) covering those risks is a step in the right direction, but legislation on the minimum product features will take time.
In the absence of legislation, superfunds may need to seriously consider developing their own CIPR for the benefit of their members.
The [i3] Pension Portfolio Construction Forum attempts to raise these pertinent issues for discussion amongst superfunds: